^{Photo: Business Recorder}

The global financial sector is once again at the center of a heated discussion as several influential industry groups have urged regulators to reconsider the upcoming banking rules for crypto assets. These groups argue that the rules currently designed to manage risk may unintentionally stifle innovation and limit how banks can safely participate in the evolving digital asset space.

The Current Regulatory Approach
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has been working on a framework to guide how banks should treat crypto assets on their balance sheets. The draft rules categorize certain digital assets as extremely high risk, forcing banks to allocate more capital against them compared to traditional assets. While the goal is to protect the financial system from instability, many industry representatives believe that the framework is overly cautious and does not reflect the maturity and adoption that the sector has achieved.

Concerns Raised by Industry Leaders
Organizations representing global banks and financial institutions have expressed that the conservative stance will make it impractical for banks to engage meaningfully in crypto markets. According to them, digital assets are no longer fringe instruments but an integrated part of investment portfolios, payment systems and even cross border settlements. If banks are burdened with disproportionately high capital requirements, their ability to offer competitive products to clients will be undermined.

Innovation at Stake
The heart of the debate lies in innovation. Many banks have been experimenting with blockchain based settlement systems, tokenized assets, and custodial services for crypto investors. These advancements promise efficiency and transparency but will require regulatory room to grow. By treating crypto as a monolithic risk, the current framework could discourage the development of secure banking solutions that meet the growing demand for digital assets.

The Push for Balanced Rules
Industry groups are not advocating for the elimination of safeguards. Instead, they seek a more nuanced approach that differentiates between volatile assets and stablecoin structures or tokenized securities that carry relatively lower risks. They believe that banks with strong compliance programs and risk management systems should be able to operate in this space without facing rules that effectively lock them out.

What Comes Next
As the consultation period progresses, regulators are expected to weigh industry feedback against systemic risk considerations. The outcome of this debate will not only shape the future of banking involvement in crypto but also influence how quickly mainstream finance embraces blockchain technology. A compromise that balances safety with opportunity could open new avenues for global banks while ensuring that the financial system remains resilient.

The call for a rethink signals a pivotal moment in the relationship between traditional finance and digital assets. The choices made today will determine whether crypto integration into banking becomes a driving force for innovation or a lost opportunity slowed down by excessive caution.

‍