^{Photo: Decrypt}

Ethereum has long been celebrated as the beating heart of decentralized finance, smart contracts, and countless blockchain innovations. It is the platform behind thousands of applications, billions of dollars in digital assets, and an entire ecosystem that shapes the direction of Web3. Yet behind this vast machine lies a surprising reality: the core developers who keep Ethereum running are often paid far less than what the wider technology market offers to engineers of similar skill levels.

The invisible workforce powering Ethereum

Core developers are the individuals who work on Ethereum’s base layer, ensuring that the network runs smoothly, upgrades on schedule, and scales to meet demand. Their work involves designing complex consensus mechanisms, patching security vulnerabilities, and coordinating global upgrades such as the Merge, which transitioned Ethereum from proof of work to proof of stake. Despite the technical depth of this work, reports show that many of these developers receive salaries that fall well below what they could command in the private sector.

The gap between market and reality

According to recent data, the median salary of an Ethereum core developer is around 140 thousand dollars annually. While this may sound generous, it is considerably lower than the 250 to 300 thousand dollars that many blockchain and AI engineers earn at major technology firms. This discrepancy reveals a structural issue: the most crucial contributors to Ethereum, who ensure its security and stability, are not compensated at a level that reflects their impact.

Why the pay gap exists

The reason for this imbalance lies partly in Ethereum’s decentralized funding model. Core developers are often employed by non profit foundations, independent labs, or grant programs rather than profit driven corporations. Unlike large Web2 companies with vast budgets, these organizations allocate funds carefully, focusing on ecosystem growth rather than high salaries. Moreover, many developers are motivated by ideology and a belief in decentralization, choosing to contribute to Ethereum even at financial cost.

Risks for the ecosystem

While the passion of developers has sustained Ethereum so far, the growing pay gap poses potential risks. Talented engineers may be drawn away by private blockchain startups, AI ventures, or traditional tech firms offering higher pay. If the pipeline of skilled contributors narrows, Ethereum could face delays in network upgrades, slower responses to vulnerabilities, and reduced innovation. For a blockchain that supports billions in value, such risks carry serious consequences.

A call for sustainable incentives

There is increasing discussion within the Ethereum community about how to create sustainable funding models for core development. Ideas range from setting aside a portion of staking rewards, to creating long term grants, to forming consortiums of businesses that rely on Ethereum and therefore have an interest in funding its maintenance. These conversations highlight the recognition that securing developer talent is as critical as securing validator nodes.

What this reveals about blockchain economies

The situation with Ethereum’s developers reflects a broader challenge across blockchain ecosystems: how to balance ideology, community driven structures, and financial realities. Unlike traditional industries, where corporations handle compensation directly, decentralized networks often rely on voluntary contributions and scattered funding. This creates both resilience and vulnerability, forcing communities to continuously rethink how to value their most essential contributors.